What does in accordance with the Constitution mean? Reflections based on ethics and Kantian policy
Abstract
In the following lines we reflect on the question, «What does in accordance with the Constitution mean?», first, in terms of the relationship between legal provisions in the context of constitutional supremacy and, secondly, in terms of the constitutional interpretation considering the emblematic case of Marbury vs. Madison, which integrates the interpretation according to the Constitution and finally we analyze what in accordance with the Constitutional means on reflections related to ethics and Kantian policy with emphasis on liberty.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Díaz, F. J. (2001). Las sentencias interpretativas del Tribunal Constitucional: significado, tipología, efectos y legitimidad: análisis especial de las sentencias aditivas. Lex Nova.
Fix-Zamudio, H. y Ferrer, E. (2009). Las sentencias de los Tribunales Constitucionales. Adrus.
Herrera, C. M. (1994, octubre-diciembre). La polémica SchmittKelsen sobre el guardián de la constitución. Revista de Estudios Políticos (Nueva Época), (86), 195-227.
Kant, E. (2008). Metafísica de las costumbres. Tecnos. Kelsen, H. (2011). La garantía jurisdiccional de la constitución (la justicia constitucional). Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional, (15), 249-300.
Legal Information Institute (s. f.). Political Question Doctrine. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/political_question_doctrine#:~:text=Federal%20courts%20will%20refuse%20to,should%20not%20hear%20the%20issue
López, J. (2020). La teoría pura del Estado de Kant. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho, (36), 319-345. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/revista/113/A/2020
Marshall, J. (1803). Sentencia Marbury vs. Madison. Lecturas sobre instituciones políticas y principios constitucionales estadounidenses. https://lecturasconstitucionaleseua.juridicas.unam.mx/sentencias-tseu/marbury-vs-madison-1803/
Schmitt, C. (1983). La defensa de la constitución. Tecnos.
Tribunal Constitucional (2005). Expediente n.o 004-2004-CC/TCLima. Lima: 31 de diciembre de 2004. https://www.tc.gob.pe/jurisprudencia/2005/00004-2004-CC.pdf
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Gonzalo Chavez Rabanal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
