Subjective imputation of a possible type of fraud in the Thomas Restobar case

Keywords: recklessness, improper omission, state of emergency

Abstract

In the following lines, a case of legal-criminal relevance will be analyzed, which occurred in Peru when the COVID-19 pandemic was going through and during the State of Emergency. Thirteen young people died inside a nightclub that worked with more than one hundred and twenty attendees, this tragedy recalled several similar cases that shocked the country. For this objective, the analysis of using the national doctrine and the personal position of the author is used, also, it is addressed, among other legal-criminal and social problems that the fatal event triggered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

   

Métricas alternativas

References

Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima (2011). Sentencia. Expediente n.o 43-05. Lima: 22 de noviembre de 2011.

Sisniegas, R. (2016). Conceptos de dolo eventual, culpa consciente y su aplicación-abandono de la teoría ecléctica. Teoría única global de la imputación del dolo eventual y la culpa consciente [Tesis de maestría, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://tesis.pucp.edu.pe/repositorio/bitstream/handle/20.500.12404/8632/ Sisniegas_%20Roger_Conceptos.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Sisniegas, R. (s. f.) Omisión impropia. https://www.academia.edu/11176413/OMISI%C3%93N_IMPROPIA_ROGER_ SISNIEGAS_RODR%C3%8DGUEZ

Zaffaroni, E., Alagia, A. y Slokar, A. (2000). Derecho penal. Parte general. Ediar.

Published
2020-12-22
How to Cite
Sisniegas Rodríguez, R. (2020). Subjective imputation of a possible type of fraud in the Thomas Restobar case. Revista Oficial Del Poder Judicial, 12(14), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.35292/ropj.v12i14.177
Section
Research Articles