La aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en los procesos constitucionales de tutela de derechos fundamentales
Abstract
This article seeks to reflect on the implementation of artificial intelligence in constitutional processes, specifically the amparo and habeas corpus processes against judicial resolutions, and with it, the aporia that such an end would mean, in the To the extent that currently it is a complex task for the plaintiffs, the determination of the impact on fundamental rights in their constitutionally protected content in ordinary judicial processes, which means that said processes, when constitutionalized, do not merit a sentence. founded, and in many cases the inadmissibility becomes a determining factor. From such a perspective, it is interesting to ask ourselves would the implementation of artificial intelligence be effective for the resolution of constitutional processes that question judicial resolutions, from the perspective of the defense of fundamental rights and effective procedural protection? To answer this question, it involves denoting the relationship between law and artificial intelligence and identifying the problems in the constitutional processes denoted in order to verify if AI becomes the answer to the existing problem.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Castope, L. (2023, 04 de noviembre). Suplemento Jurídica: Los desafíos de la inteligencia artificial en el sistema de justicia. El Peruano. https://www.elperuano.pe/noticia/209807-suplemento-juridica-los-desafios-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-en-el-sistema-de-justicia
Guastini, R. (2018). Filosofía del Derecho Positivo. Palestra Editores
IBM. (2021). ¿Qué es la IA? https://www.ibm.com/mx-es/topics/artificial-intelligence
Kant, I. (1996). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Editorial Ariel S.A.
Reis, A. (2019). El poder de control empresarial en la Web 2.0 y la dignidad del trabajador: el uso laboral de los dispositivos móviles y entornos colaborativos. Editorial Bomarzo.
Recasens, L. (2003). Vida Humana, Sociedad y Derecho. Biblioteca Virtual Universal.
Revista Peruana de Derecho Constitucional N° 14, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales del Tribunal Constitucional del Perú (Comp.), Ni urgente ni necesario; más bien: desastroso. Reflexiones sobre los efectos del Código Procesal Constitucional a más de un año de vigencia, Tupayachi, Jhonny, Diciembre 2022, p.55-85.
Sánchez, R. (1993). Remedio, Introducción al Estado Constitucional. Editorial Ariel S.A.
Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional del Perú. Expediente 0030-2021-PI/TC. 9 de marzo de 2023.
Susskind, R. (1996). The Future of Law. Oxford University Press.
Trazegnies, F. (2013). ¿Seguirán existiendo jueces en el futuro?: el razonamiento judicial y la inteligencia artificial. Ius Et Veritas, 23(47), 112-130.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jhonny Tupayachi Sotomayor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
