Las redes de citación y su relevancia para la administración del conocimiento de los precedentes judiciales en México
Abstract
Effective knowledge management in legal citation networks is vital in the modern practice of law, as it enables more consistent and fair application of judicial precedent, enables informed decision making and supports the law's sustained evolution, especially under technology evolution and pressure from the digital divide. The opportunities to improve and transfigure the practice of law are equally vast., are significant, the opportunities to improve and revolutionize legal practice are equally vast, as we move towards an increasingly digitized future, the ability to effectively manage and utilize legal knowledge will be increasingly valuable, not only to legal professionals, but to the integrity and effectiveness of the justice system as a whole.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Bernal Pulido, C., Camarena González, R., Martínez Verástegui, A. (2018). El precedente en la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
Cairampoma Arroyo, A. (2014). La regulación de los precedentes administrativos en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. (73), 483-504. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201402.014
Cross, F. B., Spriggs II, J.F. (2010). The Most Important (and Best) Supreme Court Opinions and Justices. Emory Law Journal. 60(2), 407-502.
Devlin, J., Ming-Wei, C., Lee, K., Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf
Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T. R., Spriggs II, J. F., Jeon, S., Wahlbeck, P. J. (2017). Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis, 15(3), 324-346. doi:10.1093/pan/mpm011
García Ramírez, S. (2018). Panorama de la jurisprudencia interamericana sobre derechos humanos. Colección CNDH. Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos.
García Ramírez, S., Islas de González Mariscal, O. (2021). La justicia penal en México. Balance de dos décadas (2000-2020). IIJ-UNAM.
Garner, B. A., Bea, C., White Berch, R., Gorsuch, N.M., M., et al. (2016). The Law of Judicial Precedent. Thomson Reuters.
Janececk, V., Williams, R., Keep, E. (2021). Education for the provision of technologically enhanced legal services. Computer Law and Security Review. 40(4), 1-13.
Ladley, J. , John. (2020). Data Governance. How to Design, Deploy, and Sustain an Effective Data Governance Program. (2a ed.). Academic Press.
Liu, Y.; Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Stoyanov, V. (2019). RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach. https://openreview.net/forum?id=SyxS0T4tvS
López Medina, D.E., (2000). El derecho de los jueces. (2a ed.) Legis, 2000.
Marín Santoyo, M.E. (2020). El precedente en el derecho colombiano: La estructuración del concepto y su aplicación por la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional. Derecho Público Iberoamericano, octubre(15).87-112.
Osborne, M. (2004). Making the most of the best: Formulating a knowledge management strategy for a government advisory body. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(3), 43-52.
Pérez Ragone, A., y Pessoa Pereira, P. (2015). Función de las cortes supremas de Brasil y Chile en la generación y gestión del precedente judicial entre lo público y lo privado. Revista de Derecho Valparaíso, (44), 173-214.
Pilati Scheleder, A.F. (2017). Precedentes e Jurisprudência no Sistema Jurídico Brasileiro: Uma Distinção Necessária. Revisa de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça, 3(2). 75.94.
Studwell, B. (4 enero de 2019). Speeding Up Legal Research by Mapping Citation Networks. Medium. https://perma.cc/Z7YD-JWXW
Taruffo, M. (1997). Institutional factors influencing precedents. En: MacCormick, D. N., Summers, R.S., y Goodhart, A.L. (Eds.). Interpreting precedents: A comparative study. Ashgate Publishing.
Trejo Medina, D. (2009). Identificación, análisis y aprovechamiento de la administración del conocimiento para la empresa y organización mexicana del siglo XXI. DIDAC.
Trejo Medina, D. (2023). Inteligencia organizacional. Perspectiva desde la administración del conocimiento. Pacholabra Ediciones.
Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Trejo Medina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
