The omission of pronouncement on the arguments of the administered as grounds for nullity of the administrative act
Abstract
The present work deals with the omission of pronouncement by the administration in relation to the arguments and evidence presented by the administered, a situation that has not deserved further development in the doctrine addressed in it, but that has been considered as a cause of nullity of the administrative act in certain judicial decisions, given that the principle of due administrative procedure is violated and the motivation requirement is breached and, therefore, the right of defense of the company is strongly affected. In this line, it is convenient to deepen and disseminate this omission as grounds for nullity of the administrative act.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Danós, J. (2022). La evolución de las garantías jurídicas de los administrados en el Perú. Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Administrativo, (1), 157-223.
De la Fuente, N. (2020). La motivación de los actos administrativos [Trabajo de fin de grado, Universidad de Valladolid]. Repositorio documental. https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/handle/10324/46918/TFG-D_01040.pdf?sequence=1
Dromi, R. (2005). Derecho administrativo (t. I). Gaceta Jurídica.
García de Enterría, E. y Fernández, T. R. (2006). Curso de derecho administrativo (t. I). Palestra; Temis.
Gordillo, A. (2003). Tratado de derecho administrativo (tt. 1 y 3). Fundación de Derecho Administrativo.
Guzmán, C. (2011). Tratado de la Administración pública y del procedimiento administrativo. Ediciones Caballero Bustamante.
Hitters, J. C. (1984). Técnicas de los recursos extraordinarios y de la casación. Librería Editora Platense.
Huapaya, R. (2019). El proceso contencioso-administrativo. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial.
Jiménez, J. (2020). El proceso contencioso-administrativo peruano: breve historia, presente y perspectivas futuras. Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial, 11(13), 41-79. https://doi.org/10.35292/ropj.v11i13.39
Milkes, I. (2019). Buena administración y la motivación de los actos administrativos expedidos en ejercicio de facultades discrecionales. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (21), 153-178. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/rdigdad21&div=10&id=&page=
Morón, J. C. (2018). Comentarios a la Ley del Procedimiento Administrativo General (t. 1). Gaceta Jurídica.
Recaséns, L. (1961). Tratado general de filosofía del derecho. Porrúa.
Copyright (c) 2024 Juan José Linares San Román
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
