The prior DNA paternity testing to determinate the identity of the child. The importance of the order of filiation in the Judicial Determination of Out-of-Wedlock Paternity: prior, clear and simple

Keywords: right of identity, biological test, DNA paternity testing, legal certainty

Abstract

This study analyzes some cases when the defendant is obligated to realize the DNA paternity testing into the context to determinate the identity of the child into judicial process. The different legal reforms in the Extramarital Paternity Judicial Filiation Process have created changes in compliance with the law: now, once again, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit and notified him, ten days later, the DNA test will be paid and performed by the accused. Only this test serves to determine his innocence: if he did not take the test, the court will declare paternity However, despite the legal reforms mentioned the problem respect to determinate the paternity persists: opposing the declaration of paternity is insufficient. Cases in which the accused does not take the necessary steps to obtain the biological evidence are analyzed. For example, the failure to pay for  the test within the expected period: partial payment when it is a fractional payment or when the defendant reclaims legal aid, and another cases. In other cases, Legal Practices use quick fixes or delay Legal Instruments. In both cases, they created injustice for the accused and did not protect the Child’s right to Identity Consequently, I believe that it is necessary to create Jurisprudential Precedents that limit this new Legal Design and its Legal Practices. Additionally, it is important to redesign this legal performance to
obtain the Biological Test.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

   

Métricas alternativas

References

Cabanellas, G. (2013). Diccionario jurídico elemental (15.a ed.). Lima: Heliasta.

De la Fuente, R. (2017). Las nuevas modificaciones a la Ley de filiación judicial de paternidad extramatrimonial. ¿Un retroceso en la investigación de la paternidad y en la protección al principio del interés superior del niño? Gaceta Civil & Procesal Civil Registral/Notarial, 51, 29-36. Recuperado de https://hdl.handle.net/11042/3125

Fernández, C. (1992). Derecho a la identidad personal. Buenos Aires: Astrea.

Ninahuamán, N. (2017). Aplicación de los derechos constitucionales y su incidencia en el proceso de filiación de paternidad extramatrimonial en la provincia de Ica. Recuperado de https://upica.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/4.-03.-Investigaci%C3%B3nAplicaci_n_de_los_Derechos_Constitucionales-24-3.pdf

Poder Judicial del Perú (2010). Tercer Pleno Casatorio Civil. Lima: Poder Judicial del Perú.

Ramírez, B. (2018). ¿Yo soy tu padre?: reflexiones sobre la regulación actual de la paternidad extramatrimonial. Persona y Familia. Revista del Instituto de Familia, 1(7), 107-133. Recuperado de http://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/personayfamilia/article/view/1254/1201

Ruiz, M. C. (2011). Las intimaciones judiciales en el proceso civil. Barcelona: Atelier.

Wong, J. J. (2018). El derecho a la verdad biológica de los niños, comentario a la sentencia recaída en la Casación n.o 2245-2014-San Martín. En VV. AA. Los procesos judiciales en el derecho de familia (pp. 191-217). Lima: Instituto Pacífico.

Published
2020-06-26
How to Cite
Rimachi Huaripaucar, H. (2020). The prior DNA paternity testing to determinate the identity of the child. The importance of the order of filiation in the Judicial Determination of Out-of-Wedlock Paternity: prior, clear and simple. Revista Oficial Del Poder Judicial, 11(13), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.35292/ropj.v11i13.42
Section
Research Articles