The so-called constitutional block as a parameter of constitutional interpretation, is it necessary in Peru?
Abstract
The Constitutional Tribunal of the Peru, to fulfill the function of maximum interpreter of the Constitution, to determine the correct interpretation in a concrete case and to fulfill its main function, of determining the subjected unconstitutionality to its knowledge, does not only use the norms contained in the Constitution, it almost always goes to other norms and approaches that are known as the parameter of constitutionality or block of constitutionality whose necessity or importance is in debate
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
Copyright (c) 2012 Artemio Daniel Meza Hurtado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
