Is it possible to convert penalty in a post-decision Act? need to rethink Plenary Agreement No 3-2012
Abstract
The work aims to answer the problem that affects a large sector of the primary crime, petty or bagatelle, where the defendants are deprived of their liberty for breach of the rules of conduct imposed in a suspended sentence in its execution or reserve conviction, basically for nonpayment of the civil repair, in spite of being satisfied such payment but postdated. Therefore, it is proposed that the conversion results viable in execution of a guilty verdict, as well as carrying out a weighing trial between two relevant constitutional principles of the same value and hierarchy, such as the principle of immutability of the judged thing vs. principle of humanity of penalties.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
Copyright (c) 2016 Manuel Arrieta Ramírez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
