Is electoral protection necessary to protect political rights in electoral processes?
Abstract
The Peruvian constitutional justice has established that the resolutions of the JNE can be revised when they affect fundamental rights; being that the appropriate mechanism is the process of amparo; however, its use has not been effective, given that there are few cases in which it has repaired the violated right and most of the time ends up determining responsibility of the authorities that violate these rights; hence the need to assess the possibility of establishing an electoral amparo with procedures and instances different from the classic amparo.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
Copyright (c) 2016 Walter A. Díaz Zegarra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
