The «procedural autonomy» and the Constitutional Court: notes on an invented relationship
Abstract
The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural autonomy». Finally, the author concludes that with his article he looks to reveal that the use of the Constitutional Procedural Autonomy has been the foundation for the harmful effects caused in various verdict of the Constitutional Court.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
