Problems in the non-quantification of the monetary claims in the New Procedural Labor Act: Darkness and ambiguity
Abstract
The New Procedural Labor Act has promoted the principles of orality and procedural economy, but a problem arises when monetary claims are promoted without expressing the amount of these. Such scenery creates a situation of ambiguity that allows the defendant to formulate an «exception», and thereby delay the process due to the negligence of the plaintiff. In this work, it is proposed that the plaintiff will be obliged to quantify the amount required at the relevant hearing, in order to allow the defendant to know this amount in a timely manner and not harm his right of defense.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alsina, H. (1956). Tratado teórico práctico de derecho procesal civil y comercial (t. 1) (2.a ed.). Buenos Aires: Ediar Editores.
Avendaño Valdez, J. (2010). El interés para obrar. Thēmis. Revista de Derecho, (58), 63-69.
Congreso de la República (2010). Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo, Ley n.o 29497. Lima: 13 de enero de 2010.
Monroy, J. (2004). La formación del proceso civil peruano. Lima: Palestra.
Pacheco-Zerga, L. (2013). Las remuneraciones devengadas en un proceso de amparo: Casación Laboral 992-2012-Arequipa, 09/03/2012. Repositorio Institucional PIRHUA. Recuperado de https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11042/2635/Remuneraciones_ devengadas_procesos_amparos.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Vinatea, L. et al. (2010). Comentarios a la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo: análisis normativo. Lima: Gaceta Jurídica.
Copyright (c) 2020 The Review of Procedural Labor Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal allows authors to retain their copyright of the submitted articles without any restrictions.
The authors grant the publisher non-exclusive publishing rights for the publication of approved manuscripts.
The publisher only reserves first publication rights, but this does not imply that the authors lose their unrestricted copyright.
