Problems in the non-quantification of the monetary claims in the New Procedural Labor Act: Darkness and ambiguity
Abstract
The New Procedural Labor Act has promoted the principles of orality and procedural economy, but a problem arises when monetary claims are promoted without expressing the amount of these. Such scenery creates a situation of ambiguity that allows the defendant to formulate an «exception», and thereby delay the process due to the negligence of the plaintiff. In this work, it is proposed that the plaintiff will be obliged to quantify the amount required at the relevant hearing, in order to allow the defendant to know this amount in a timely manner and not harm his right of defense.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alsina, H. (1956). Tratado teórico práctico de derecho procesal civil y comercial (t. 1) (2.a ed.). Buenos Aires: Ediar Editores.
Avendaño Valdez, J. (2010). El interés para obrar. Thēmis. Revista de Derecho, (58), 63-69.
Congreso de la República (2010). Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo, Ley n.o 29497. Lima: 13 de enero de 2010.
Monroy, J. (2004). La formación del proceso civil peruano. Lima: Palestra.
Pacheco-Zerga, L. (2013). Las remuneraciones devengadas en un proceso de amparo: Casación Laboral 992-2012-Arequipa, 09/03/2012. Repositorio Institucional PIRHUA. Recuperado de https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11042/2635/Remuneraciones_ devengadas_procesos_amparos.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Vinatea, L. et al. (2010). Comentarios a la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo: análisis normativo. Lima: Gaceta Jurídica.
Copyright (c) 2020 The Review of Procedural Labor Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows them to use what is published (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (e.g., a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
