First approaches to jurisdictional decision-making bodies of the Peruvian Judiciary
Abstract
In this article we show the initial findings on the different types of courts existing in the Peruvian Judiciary today, their primary characteristics and what the creation of a complex diversity of categories of courts can reveal in terms of response of the Peruvian State against the social conflicts it is obliged to address.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Aristóteles (2008). Ética nicomáquea. Ética eudemia. Gredos.
Hernández, W. (2008). La carga procesal bajo la lupa: por materia y tipo de órgano jurisdiccional. Instituto de Defensa Legal.
Montesquieu, C. de S. (1906). El espíritu de las leyes (t. 1). Librería General de Victoriano Suárez.
Poder Judicial (2021). Estadísticas de la función jurisdiccional a nivel nacional. Período enero-diciembre 2021. Gerencia General, Gerencia de Planificación, Subgerencia de Estadística.
Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Godenzi Cuéllar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
