Digital transformation and pandemic: New paradigms
Abstract
In many ways, the COVID-19 pandemic has compromised the development of the nations, configured a number of restrictions to the fundamental rights and radically changed the lives of human beings in several negative aspects. However, there are also aspects that, as a result of the virus, are being redirected and that pose major challenges for the Judiciaries. Hence, it may be argued that these are new paradigms that allow us to rethink the judicial work and assume a relevant role in the digital transformation of the work of judges. Aspects, such as virtual hearings, the demand for investment in technology and a new approach in the role of judges to increase their use of artificial intelligence tools, imply important changes both in the present and in the years to come, and at the same time become paradigms with a view to improving the new tasks of judges.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Asís de Roig, R. (2020). Inteligencia artificial y derechos humanos. Materiales de Filosofía del Derecho n.o 2020/04. 1-18. Seminario Permanente Gregorio Peces-Barba. Grupo de Investigación «Derechos humanos, Estado de Derecho y Democracia». Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/30453/WF-20-04.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Chakraborty, S. y Bhojwani, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence and human rights: are they convergent or parallel to each other? Novum Jus, 12(2), 13-38. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8f62/d418d76d642dc73233fb816233d991d6783b.pdf?_ga=2.219919569.995596598.1648565647-776875690.1648565647
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) (2021). Tecnologías digitales para un nuevo futuro. Naciones Unidas. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/46816/1/S2000961_es.pdf
Corvalán, J. (2019). Prometea. Inteligencia Artificial para transformar organizaciones públicas. Astrea; Universidad del Rosario; DPI Cuántico; IMODEV. https://dpicuantico.com/libros/prometea_oea.pdf
Cotino, L. (2017). Bigdata e inteligencia artificial. Una aproximación a su tratamiento jurídico desde los derechos fundamentales. Dilemata, (24), 131-150.
El Comercio (2019, 23 de julio). Justicia de papel [Documental]. https://elcomercio.pe/lima/youtube-mira-justicia-papel-documental-comercio-precariedad-sistema-justicia-peruano-viral-video-noticia-662938-noticia/
Gascón, A. (2020). Derechos humanos e inteligencia artificial. En Pérez, A., Terual, G., Raffiota, E. C. y Iadicco, M. P. (dirs.), Setenta años de Constitución Italiana y cuarenta años de Constitución Española: Vol. V. Retos en el siglo XXI (pp. 335-350). Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339687454_Derechos_Humanos_e_Inteligencia_Artificial
Martínez, J. (2019). Inteligencia y derechos humanos en la sociedad digital. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, (40), 168-189.
Rodríguez, R. (2007). El precedente constitucional en el Perú. Entre el poder de la historia y la razón de los derechos. En Carpio, E. y Grández, P. (coords.), Estudios al precedente constitucional (pp. 15-ss.). Palestra Editores.
Rua, G. (2021). Juicios orales virtuales en tiempos de pandemia. Sistemas Judiciales, (24), 158-171. https://sistemasjudiciales.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/14.-SJ24.-Rua.pdf
Saavedra, V. y Upegui, J. (2021). Colombia. PretorIA y la automatización del procesamiento de causas de derechos humanos. Derechos digitales América Latina; Dejusticia. https://www.dejusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CPC_informe_Colombia.pdf
Copyright (c) 2022 Edwin Figueroa Gutarra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
