Judges and argumentation
Abstract
The construction of legal arguments by a judge requires the correlation of necessary concepts that identify the theory of law, the philosophy of law, the fundamental rights and the proposal of schools of legal argumentation. Our study offers a few initial thoughts on how the judicial work can be strengthened by identifying core concepts related to the proposed ideas and by providing arguments to justify them
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
Copyright (c) 2012 Edwin Figueroa Gutarra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
