The probatory rules and the need for their application at the judgment stage. Doing it is good judicial practice
Abstract
Although our Peruvian Procedural Code does not regulate the evidentiary conventions at the trial stage, the author states that circumstances exist and justify its application at that stage, as they are: the lack of knowledge of theory of the case, the consent of the accused, not violate the probative discussion, the change of «notorious fact» for «undisputed fact», as well as simplification and the speed of trial. It explains three specific cases where evidentiary conventions were formulated at the stage of trial, concluding that although there is no express provision which allows implementation, neither exists compatibility in order to accept those evidentiary conventions which have not been previously promoted by the legal parties, therefore it proposes a legislative amendment.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
Copyright (c) 2016 Carlos Germán Gutiérrez Gutiérrez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
