Binding and legal arbitration in public procurement

  • Mario Castillo Freyre
  • Rita Sabroso Minaya
Keywords: Arbitration, Government procurement

Abstract

Application of a mandatory arbitration clause, when differences arise as to the performance or construction of government acquisition and procurement agreements, has represented a momentous change for the public administration, not only in Peru, but in Latin America as a whole. This evidences and emphasizes the efficiency of the arbitrary channel as an alternative conflict solving mean, reducing time, costs and risks in contract relationships between the Government and individuals, thus guaranteeing national and foreign investment. In this order of ideas, although arbitration is applied mandatorily and compulsorily, it does not deny its consensual nature. It also establishes a considerable difference with the General Arbitration Act, which, despite the existence of an arbitration agreement, enables the parties to agree to resort to the Judiciary. So, we have an ipso jure arbitration in public procurement

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
821
Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202652
|

   

Métricas alternativas

Published
2020-10-02
How to Cite
Castillo Freyre, M., & Sabroso Minaya, R. (2020). Binding and legal arbitration in public procurement. Revista Oficial Del Poder Judicial, 5(5), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.35292/ropj.v5i5.220
Section
Research Articles