Are we truly guilty? Critical notes on the theory of culpability in light of neuroscience
Abstract
This article seeks, through the study of neuroscience, to reexamine the concept of culpability in criminal law and its current validity in light of new neuroscientific findings, especially those related to decision-making. It questions the justification for blame, reevaluating the theory of culpability alongside these new insights. The goal is to assess whether its application is truly justified, and if not, to consider that the current intervention of criminal blame lacks sufficient grounds. By studying the neural mechanisms underlying decision-making, the traditional notion of free will is challenged, opening new perspectives for rethinking the foundations of the criminal justice system, based on the understanding that criminal actions may not be the result of conscious intent.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Abarca, M., Vargas, C., Romero, D., Villanueva, D. y Arancibia, M. (2022). Aspectos neurobiológicos en la toma de decisiones afectivas y sociales e influencia del estrés: posibles implicancias en la toma de decisiones clínicas. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 60(2), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92272022000200176
Bacigalupo, E. (1999). Derecho penal. Parte general. Hammurabi.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H. y Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295
Bockmeyer, J. (2014). Probation and effective rehabilitation - an alternative to incarceration? Using neuroscience to facilitate rehabilitation methods. MaRBLe, 5, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2014.v5.210
Coppola, F. (2018). Valuing emotions in punishment: an argument for social rehabilitation with the aid of social and affective neuroscience. Neuroethics, 14, 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9393-4
Cury, E. (2004). Derecho penal: parte general. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Damasio, A. R. (1996). El error de Descartes. La razón de las emociones. Andrés Bello.
Deckers, L. (2018). Motivation: Biological, psychological, and environmental (5.a ed.). Routledge.
Drago, F., Galbiati, R. y Vertova, P. (2009). Prison conditions and recidivism. En CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443093
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. International Universities Press.
Freud, S. (1930). El malestar en la cultura [Das Unbehagen in der Kultur]. Amorrortu Editores.
Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S. R. y Bem, S. (2000). Emotions and beliefs. Cambridge University Press.
Gilligan, J. (2001). Violence: A reflection on the national epidemic. Pantheon Books.
Houlsman, L. (1992). The abolitionist case: Alternative crime policies. Israel Law Review, 25(3-4), 681-709. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700010694
Jakobs, G. (2004). Fundamentos del derecho penal. Ad-Hoc.
LeDoux, J. E. (1999). The emotional brain. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Levenson, R. W. (1999). The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 481-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379159
Mañalich, J. P. (2007). La pena como retribución. Segunda parte: la retribución como teoría del derecho penal. Derecho Penal y Criminología, 28(83), 75-120.
Martínez-Selva, J. M., Sánchez-Navarro, J. P., Bechara, A. y Román, F. (2006). Mecanismos cerebrales de la toma de decisiones. Revista de Neurología, 42(07), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4207.2006161
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R. y Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
Onofre, C. I. (2019). Emoción y sentimiento: aspectos neurobiológicos del principio ético material universal dusseliano. Stoa, 10(19), 40-71. https://doi.org/10.25009/st.2019.19.2551
Parma, C. (2001). El pensamiento de Günther Jakobs. El derecho penal del siglo XXI. Ediciones Jurídicas Cuyo.
Politoff, S., Matus, J. P. y Ramírez, M. C. (2003). Lecciones de derecho penal chileno. Parte general. Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
Rilling J. K., King-Casas, B. y Sanfey, A. G. (2008). The neurobiology of social decision-making. Current Opinion Neurobiology, 18(2), 159-165.
Roxin, C. (1976). Problemas básicos del derecho penal. Reus.
Roxin, C. (1981). Culpabilidad y prevención en derecho penal. Reus.
Roxin, C. (1997). Derecho penal. Parte general (t. I). Civitas.
Roxin, C. (2008). Fundamentos político-criminales del derecho penal. Hammurabi.
Roxin, C., Jakobs, G., Schünemann, B., Frisch, W. y Köhler, M. (2000). Sobre el estado de la teoría del delito [Seminario en la Universitat Pompeu Fabra, España].
Scarantino, A. y De Sousa, R. (2021). Emotion. En Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology (4.ª ed.). J. B. Lippincott.
Von Wright, G. H. (2003). Valor, norma y acción en mis escritos filosóficos: con un epílogo cartesiano. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, (26), 53-78.
Walmsley, R. (2016). Lista mundial de población penitenciaria (11.a ed.). Instituto de Investigación de Políticas Criminales.
Copyright (c) 2025 Belén Constanza González Maldonado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
