Right to effective judicial protection and right to enforcement of final judgments in Law n.° 29497, New Labor Procedure Law
Abstract
The right to effective judicial protection will be studied to show that the actual, timely and in its own terms execution of judicial decisions with the quality of res judicata, constitutes part of its essential content; and, being the obligation of every judge the materialization of the same, it is necessary to verify if the provisions contained in Law No. 29497, the New Labor Procedure Law (NLPT), fulfill this purpose, favoring its realization within a reasonable time or if, on the contrary, this stage of execution constitutes the bottleneck of the new Peruvian labor procedural model, violating the effectiveness of what has been decided; in a process, whose pre-eminence of orality and immediacy, has contributed profoundly to the satisfaction of the right of action of workers and employers, with the effective and prompt declaration or denial of their claimed rights.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Amado, A. (s. f.). El derecho a la ejecución de sentencias como contenido implícito del derecho a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva: análisis de la sentencia recaída en el Exp. N° 03515-2020-PA/TC (Caso Justo Caparo). Docplayer. https://docplayer.es/33774095-Alexamado-rivadeneyra.html
Ayala, C. (2007). La ejecución de sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Estudios Constitucionales, 5(1), 127-201. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r38576.pdf
Carrasco, M. (2020). La definición constitucional del derecho a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva. Revista de Derecho Político, (107), 13-40. https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/27182/21169
Congreso Constituyente Democrático (1993). Constitución Política del Perú. Lima: 30 de diciembre de 1993. https://www.oas.org/juridico/spanish/per_res17.pdf
Congreso de la República del Perú (2010). Ley n.o 29497, Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo. Lima: 15 de enero de 2010. https://www.pj.gob.pe/wps/wcm/connect/bf9d4d0043eacd588837db829214c4f0/C.+LEGISLACION+Ley+N%C2%BA+29497+Nueva+Ley+Procesal+del+Trabajo.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2019). Sentencia en el caso Muelle Flores vs. Perú (Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas). San José: 6 de marzo de 2019. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_375_esp.pdf
Gamarra, L. (2014). El Título Preliminar de la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo. En G. Quispe y L. Valderrama (eds.), Nuevas instituciones del proceso laboral (pp. 9-21). Gaceta Jurídica.
Hurtado, M. (2006). Tutela jurisdiccional diferenciada. Palestra.
Ministerio de Justicia (1993). Decreto Supremo n.o 017-93-JUS, que Aprueba el Texto Único Ordenado de la Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial. Lima: 3 de junio de 1993. https://www.minjus.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/DGDOJ-Ley-Org%C3%A1nicaPoder-Judicial-y-Ministerio-P%C3%BAblico.pdf
Monroy, J. (1996). Introducción al proceso civil (t. I). Temis.
Organización de Estados Americanos (1969). Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos (Pacto de San José de Costa Rica). San José: 22 de noviembre de 1969. http://www.cidh.oas.org/Basicos/Spanish/Basicos2.htm
Tribunal Constitucional (2005). Expediente n.o 04119-2005-PA/ TC-Lima. Arequipa: 29 de agosto de 2005. https://tc.gob.pe/jurisprudencia/2006/04119-2005-AA.pdf
Tribunal Constitucional (2011). Expediente n.o 03515-2010-PA/TCCusco. Arequipa: 9 de noviembre de 2011. https://tc.gob.pe/jurisprudencia/2011/03515-2010-AA.pdf
Tribunal Constitucional (2015). Expediente n.o 00295-2012-PHC/ TC-Lima. Lima: 14 de mayo de 2015. https://tc.gob.pe/jurisprudencia/2015/00295-2012-HC.pdf
Copyright (c) 2023 Cecilia Leonor Espinoza Montoya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows them to use what is published (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (e.g., a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
