Brief reflections on judgments in the process of Peruvian labor reform
Abstract
Topics of legal argumentation in labor judgments, under Act No. 29497, New Labor Procedural Act, contain some questions and reflections of some aspects that, in our opinion, have not been addressed with the necessary seriousness and relevance, such as labor court judgments, specifically, in the precision and accurateness degrees that involve its argumentation, since the judgment contains certain guidelines which differentiate it from sentences issued within the framework of other judicial proceedings, such as criminal, civil, family proceedings, etc. In this sense, this article provides some constructive criticism and attempted elements of judgment, in order to novate it in the circuit of issuing of sentences in said Act, emphasizing on argumentation.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Atienza, M. (2016). Las razones del derecho. Teorías de la argumentación jurídica. Palestra Editores.
Castillo, J. L., Luján, M. y Zavaleta, R. (2006). Razonamiento judicial: interpretación, argumentación y motivación de las resoluciones judiciales. ARA Editores.
Congreso de la República (2010). Ley n.° 29497, Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo. Lima: 13 de enero de 2010. https://www.pj.gob.pe/wps/wcm/connect/bf9d4d0043eacd588837db829214
c4f0/C.+LEGISLACION+-+Ley+N%C2%BA+29497+Nueva+Ley+Procesal+del+Trabajo.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Consejo Ejecutivo del Poder Judicial (2014). Resolución Administrativa n.° 002-2014-CE-PJ. Lima: 7 de enero de 2014. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/circular-referida-a-la-regulacion-del-reenvio-en-los-organos-res-adm-n-002-2014-ce-pj-1055282-1/
Consejo Nacional de la Magistratura (2014). Resolución n.° 120-2014- PCNM. Lima: 28 de mayo de 2014. https://img.lpderecho.pe/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Precedente-motivación-120-2014-pcnm-caso-Villasis-LP.pdf
Ferrer, J. (2011). Apuntes sobre el concepto de motivación de las decisiones judiciales. Isonomía, (34), 87-107. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/is/n34/n34a4.pdf
Ghirardi, O. A. (1997). El razonamiento judicial. Academia de la Magistratura del Perú.
Copyright (c) 2022 Gloria Lucila Laiza Espinoza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows them to use what is published (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (e.g., a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
