The principle of equality of arms in the notification of the response in the abbreviated labor proceedings of the New Labor Procedure Law
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the provision contained in article 49, paragraph 1), of the New Labor Procedure Law, regarding the moment in which the judge delivers the copy of the answer and its annexes to the plaintiff, granting him/her a prudential time to review the evidence, and also regarding the possible affectation to the principle of equality of arms. Based on this approach, we intend to discuss the scope of the principle of procedural equality and the role of the judge in the labor process.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alvarado, A. (2006). La imparcialidad judicial y el sistema inquisitivo de juzgamiento. En Montero, J. (coord.), Proceso Civil e Ideología (pp. 217-246). Tirant lo Blanch.
Ariano, E. (2006). En los abismos de la cultura del proceso autoritario. En Montero, J. (coord.), Proceso Civil e Ideología (pp. 357-379). Tirant lo Blanch.
Barbosa, J. (1986). La Igualdad en las partes en el Proceso Civil. Revista del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal, 5(5), 55-67.
Carbone, C. (2011). Tutela judicial efectiva y nuevos principios procesales: la razón del actor y la igualdad de armas. En Peyrano, J. (dir.), Principios Procesales (pp. 105-130). Rubinzal-Culzoni Editores.
Congreso de la República (2010). Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo, Ley n.o 29497. Lima: 13 de enero de 2010.
Gozaíni, O. (2020). Tratado General del Derecho Procesal. Jusbaires. Ledesma, M. (2008). Comentarios al Código Procesal Civil. Gaceta Jurídica.
Monroy, J. (2007). Teoría General del Proceso. Palestra Editores.
Olea, M. (2008). Derecho Procesal del Trabajo. Thomson Reuters.
Picó i Junoy, J. (2006). El derecho procesal entre el garantismo y la eficacia: un debate mal planteado. En Montero, J. (coord.), Proceso Civil e Ideología (pp. 109-127). Tirant lo Blanch.
Priori, G. (2019). El proceso y la tutela de los derechos. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Perú.
Tribunal Constitucional (2017). Expediente n.o 04375-2015-HC/ TC. Lima: 19 de abril de 2017.
Copyright (c) 2021 The Review of Procedural Labor Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows them to use what is published (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.
2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (e.g., a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
