Can the appellant’s non-attendance at the oral hearing generate effects on the Labour Process under Act no. 29497?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47308/rdpt.v2i2.5
Keywords: orality, hearing, appellant, constitutional guarantee, efficiency, celerity

Abstract

The principle of orality has become one of the main foundations of labour process according to the Peruvian New Labour Process Act No 29497. Also, in harmony with the other principles, it guarantees celerity and efficiency in the current labor procedural model. In that sense, the use of oral hearing, even at the appeal stage, with the duty of oral support of the appeal remedy, does not impose a disproportionate or unreasonable burden. Following this order of ideas, the objective of this article is to illustrate to the legal community the effects to be generated by non­attendance, and to analyse whether the application of these effects implies an «inequality of arms» in the labour judicial process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bozo Scotto, N. (noviembre, 2015). La carga procesal del recurrente de comparecer a la audiencia de apelación en el proceso laboral. Vltima Ratio. Boletín Trimestral de la Sociedad Venezolana para el Estudio del Derecho Latinoamericano. Recuperado de http://vltimaratio.blogspot.com/2015/11/proceso-laboral-envenezuela.html

Congreso de la República (2010). Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo, Ley n.º 29497. Lima: 13 de enero de 2010.

Corte Constitucional de Colombia (2015). Sentencia C-424/15. Bogotá: 8 de julio de 2015.

Devis Echandía, H. (2011). Teoría general de la prueba judicial (t. I) (6.ª ed.). Bogotá: Temis.

Duce, M. et al. (2008). Reforma a los procesos civiles orales: consideraciones desde el debido proceso y calidad de la información. En Cabezón, A. (coord.), Justicia civil: una perspectiva para la reforma en América Latina (pp. 13-94). Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA).

Ministerio del Trabajo y Seguridad Social (2002). Ley Orgánica Procesal del Trabajo de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Caracas: 13 de agosto de 2002.

Plá Rodríguez, A. (1998). Los principios del derecho del trabajo (3.ª ed. actualizada). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Depalma.

Published
2020-11-27
How to Cite
Rodríguez Riojas, J. I. (2020). Can the appellant’s non-attendance at the oral hearing generate effects on the Labour Process under Act no. 29497?. The Review of Procedural Labor Law, 2(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.47308/rdpt.v2i2.5
Issue
Vol 2 No 2 (2020): July - December
Section
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 The Review of Procedural Labor Law

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows them to use what is published (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).

1. The journal allows authors to retain their copyrights of submitted articles without any restrictions.

2. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in the Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).

3. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (e.g., a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).