The access to administrative justice for prisoners under French law

Keywords: access to administrative justice, prisoners, European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, France

Abstract

This study focuses on the access of detainees to French administrative justice; in this regard, the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights is evaluated, as it plays a decisive role, especially when enforcing the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights on the rights and freedoms of prisoners, who must be detained in conditions compatible with respect for human dignity. The French jurisdictional dualism (judicial and administrative) influences the designation of the competent judge to hear appeals brought by detainees to challenge the legality of the measures taken against them or to obtain compensation for the damage suffered. The distribution of competences between administrative and judicial judges regularly creates obstacles for detainees’ access to effective remedies. In this regard, it is postulated that the unification and institution of a specialized jurisdiction for prison disputes would allow detainees better access to justice in France.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (1966). Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos. Adoptado y abierto a la firma, ratificación y adhesión por la Asamblea General en su Resolución 2200 A (XXI), de 16 de diciembre de 1966. https://www.ohchr.org/sp/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx

Bienvenu, J. J. (1985). Remarques sur quelques tendances de la doctrine contemporaine en droit administratif. Droits, (1), 153-ss.

Bouju, D. (2005). Le détenu face aux mesures d’ordre intérieur. Reveu du Droit Public, (3), 597-634.

Cassin, R. y Waline, M. (2019). Medidas de orden interno. Consejo de Estado As., 17 de febrero de 1995, Hardouin y Marie. En Jurisprudencia administrativa del Consejo de Estado francés (pp. 871-882). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado. https://www.boe.es/biblioteca_juridica/abrir_pdf.php?id=PUBPB-2018-86_2

Conseil d’Etat (2017, 15 avril). Le juge administratif et l’administration pénitentiaire. Conseil d’Etat. https://www.conseil-etat.fr/content/download/145811/document/Le%20juge%20administratif%20 et%20l%27administration%20p%C3%A9nitentiaire_maj250417.pdf

Guyomar, M. (2009). Le juge administratif, juge pénitentiaire. Au Titiun, P., Hostiou, R., Vigoroux, C. et Cassia, P., Mélanges offerts en l’honneur d’Yves Jegouzo. Terres du droit (pp. 471-ss.). Dalloz.

Jèze, G. (1929). Les libertés individuelles. Rapport. Annuaire de l’institut international de droit public, 162-189. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k9756894k/f10.item.texteImage.zoom

Lefebvre Dalloz (2020). Référé-liberté (Contentieux administratif). Lefebvre Dalloz. https://www.dalloz.fr/documentation/Document?id=DZ%2FOASIS%2F000876

Moreau, J. (1980). La responsabilité de l’Etat à raison du fonctionnement des établissements pénitentiaires. Au Bouzat, P., Mélanges en l’honneur du doyen Pierre Bouzat (pp. 205-216). Pedone.

Odent, R. (2007). Contentieux administratif (t. I). Dalloz.

Péchillon, É. (1998). Sécurité et droit du service public pénitentiaire. LGDJ.

Sudre, F., Milano, L. y Surrel, H. (2019). Droit européen et international des droits de l’homme. PUF.

Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
Petit, J. (2021). The access to administrative justice for prisoners under French law. Revista Llapanchikpaq: Justicia, 2(2), 161-199. https://doi.org/10.51197/lj.v2i2.8