Constitutional Criminal Law and Gender Approach: Judging with a Gender Perspective
Abstract
The study analyzes the effects of the control of constitutionality and conventionality in the Argentine system, in light of the international systems for the protection of human rights and the legal instruments to which the Argentine State is a signatory. These systems do not have derogatory effects on domestic norms, but the inapplicability of these to the specific case and the possibility of providing for actions or omissions; that is, orders to do or not to do with respect to a specific situation in order to safeguard the principle of constitutional and conventional supremacy, so that the subjective right enshrined in these hierarchically superior norms prevails. In this perspective, the aforementioned systems of rights are of mandatory and preferential application to any domestic legislation of lower rank. In other words, it is not only the text of the covenants, conventions and treaties, but also the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, its advisory opinions, declarations and resolutions, as well as the reports, recommendations and resolutions of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which can even issue precautionary measures, as well as the pronouncements, recommendations and reports of the United Nations agencies. Consequently, judges must make the necessary efforts to ensure that comprehensive reparation measures in cases of gender-based violence are based on a transformative approach; that is, that they contribute to the elimination of the patterns of discrimination and marginalization that may have been the cause of the victimizing events.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bender, D. B. (Coord.) (2013). Vulnerables. Obra Colectiva – FUNDEJUS. Edit. Lajouane.
Bodelón, E. (2012). Violencia de género y las respuestas de los sistemas penales. Ediciones Didot. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ks0bk5
Fellini, Z. y Morales Deganut, C. (2018). Violencia contra las mujeres. Editorial Hammurabi.
Figueroa, A. M. (2017). El Derecho de Género. Violencia contra las Mujeres. Trata de Personas. Edit. Ediar.
Gherardi, N. (2018). Protocolo para Juzgar con Perspectiva de Género. Publicación de ELA. Equipo Latinoamericano de Justicia y Género.
Paz, M. (Coord.) (2018). Causas de Violencia de Género. Cuarto Informe Estadístico. Editorial JUSBAIRES.
Suprema Corte de Justicia de México (2018). Manual Impartición Interseccional de Justicia con Perspectiva de Género. México- diciembre. https://www.scribd.com/document/504054262/Manual-Para-Una-Imparticion-Interseccional-de-Justicia-Con-Perspectiva- de-Genero
Tarditti, A., Altabe, M. H., Neirot de Jarma, G., Pepe, A., Dobarro, V. M., Pasten de Ishihara, G. M. (coord.) (2021). Derechos Humanos y Colectivos Vulnerables. Obra Colectiva –Publicación de AMJA– Asociación de Mujeres Jueces de Argentina- Edit. Contexto. Resistencia – Chaco – Argentina.
Copyright (c) 2024 Martha Helia Altabe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
a. The journal allows authors to retain their copyright of submitted articles without any restrictions.
b. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Llapanchipaq Justicia (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
.png){kind=logo}
