Control of criminal repetition: recidivism
Abstract
The present work analyzes the different pronouncements regarding the institute of recidivism in order to identify each of the elements that make up said institute in order to establish the necessary elements to configure recidivism at present, within the framework of current law, analyzing in an exhaustive manner the interpretation that has been given to said institute, regarding the concurrence of a custodial sentence of an effective nature, and the release of the agent of the penitentiary establishment in which he was interned, as well as the pronouncements that ratify the constitutionality of the institute of recidivism.
Downloads
Metrics
Métricas alternativas
References
Acción de Inconstitucionalidad en el Expediente n.o 003-2005-PI/TC (2006). Tribunal Constitucional (9 de agosto de 2006).
Acción de Inconstitucionalidad en el Expediente n.o 0014-2006-P1/TC (2007). Tribunal Constitucional (19 de enero de 2007).
Acuerdo Plenario 1-2008/CJ-116 (2008). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (18 de junio de 2008).
Casación n.o 1459-2017-Lambayeque (2018). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (20 de setiembre de 2018).
Casación n.o 399-2019-Lambayeque (2020). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (4 de noviembre de 2020).
Casación n.o 125-2021-El Santa (2022). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (18 de octubre de 2022).
Casación STS 5889/2003-Madrid (2003). Tribunal Supremo (30 de setiem bre de 2003).
Recurso de Nulidad n.o 2101-2017-Lima Norte (2018). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (29 de enero de 2018).
Recurso de Nulidad n.o 181-2018-Lima Norte (2018). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (20 de marzo de 2018).
Recurso de Nulidad n.o 116-2018-Lima Norte (2018). Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (19 de abril de 2018).
Copyright (c) 2024 Martín Jesús Cristóbal Jiménez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal allows authors to retain their copyright of submitted articles without any restrictions.
Authors grant the publisher non-exclusive publication rights for the publication of approved manuscripts.
The publisher only reserves first publication rights, but this does not imply that authors lose their unrestricted copyright.
