Ius Vocatio

Research Journal of the Superior Court of Justice of Huanuco.

ISSN: 2810-8043 (Online) DOI: 10.35292/iusvocatio BNP Legal Deposit: 2021-10582.

Definition

The journal Ius Vocatio is a biannual publication of the Superior Court of Justice of Huanuco, published by the Judicial Branch of the Republic of Peru, through its Judicial Research Center.

Objective

To publish unpublished and original articles that are the result of studies and research on legal and administration of justice topics, both by national and international authors.

Mission

To create a space for reflection in the search for new alternative solutions to the main hermeneutical problems that arise in the legal field.

Vision

To position itself as a leading legal journal with a glocal approach, i.e., from a local perspective transcending to the global.

Focus and scope

Ius Vocatio. Revista de Investigación de la Corte Superior de Justicia de Huánuco is a biannual publication that receives contributions from judges and servants of the Superior Court of Justice of Huánuco and researchers of law and justice in this judicial district, but also from national and foreign judges and researchers. This publication is addressed to judges and servants of the Judiciary, researchers, university professors, students and the public interested in the issues of academic reflection, critical work and legal research.

Articles are refereed anonymously by specialists from outside the institution, who take into account the following evaluation criteria: originality, contribution of the work, timeliness and contribution to legal knowledge.

The journal reserves the right of publication and, if it accepts the articles submitted, it may make the necessary style corrections and other adjustments to comply with the requirements of the publication.

Subjects

Articles concerning research on the different branches of law and on the administration of justice are accepted.

Cultural, social and economic relevance

The Ius Vocatio Journal is characterized by publishing articles that disseminate knowledge of law and justice systems with the aim of contributing to the improvement of the administration of justice, reaffirming its commitment to ethics, research and the development of human capacities.

The journal publishes the work of national and international researchers to ensure the production, distribution and reuse of knowledge.

Frequency

The journal is published every six months. The journal publishes its issues between January-June and July-December.

Editorial process and editorial flow

Articles submitted to the journal are pre-screened by the editorial team, who decide whether the article can be accepted, rejected or if it requires modifications in content. Their decision will be based on the objectives and standards of the journal. Likewise, the percentage of similarity of the manuscripts is reviewed in Turnitin and the respective report is generated. Manuscripts selected for publication are then submitted to blind peer reviewers, as detailed in the reviewer policy. https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/reviewGuidelines

Authors receive the reports through the platform and are given a deadline for the submission of observations and scopes. The new versions are sent to the reviewers and new Turnitin reports are issued. After the editorial decision, the team contacts the authors to submit the work to the proofreading team, which obtains the clean version to be sent to the layout team. Once the authors' approvals have been obtained, the publications are registered with DOI and the metadata is completed. Finally, the phase of dissemination and thanks to authors, reviewers and readers begins.

The editorial flow is developed in the following link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nOHqmu8IoxSTgBaHZ-H-oMREQ-Hstgxf/view?usp=sharing

Peer review

Manuscripts submitted through the journal's website are reviewed by the general editor and the journal's technical team to verify whether they are unpublished and original and are subsequently evaluated by the blind peer review system (read more).

Section Policy

The contents published by the magazine are structured in three sections (see  author guidelines)

1. Research articles: minimum length of 10 pages (5,000 words) and maximum length of 30 pages (15,000 words) containing theoretical, methodological, empirical and case study research.

2. Editorials: include editorial notes or presentations of the issue written by the editor, director or by invitation, maximum three pages.

3. Reviews: maximum length of four pages, including reviews or comments on books related to law and the administration of justice published in the last two years, and must contain complete bibliographic data of the material reviewed; in addition, an image of the cover of the book reviewed must be submitted.

Open Access Policy

The journal publishes each issue under Open Access (Open Access) and the articles are available for free consultation and download from the first issue under the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license (read more).

Copyrights

Authors retain the copyright of their articles published in the Ius Vocatio Journal, without any limitations.

They also grant the journal non-exclusive publication rights for the publication of approved manuscripts.

Ius Vocatio Journal only reserves the rights of first publication, which does not imply that authors lose their unrestricted copyrights (read more)

Publication charges

The journal does not require authors to pay any fees or charges for the processing of manuscripts (Article Processing Charge) or for the publication of approved articles.

Archiving

The journal uses the LOCKSS system to create a storage system. It also supports the creation of archives in the journal for preservation and restoration purposes.

Response time

Authors receive an acceptance response on average sixteen (16) weeks after submission of the manuscript (source: DOAJ).

Acceptability rate

The acceptance rate of articles per issue is over 90%. The journal publishes a minimum of articles per issue (up to five) and a maximum (up to ten).

Sources of financing for the journal

The journal's publication is based on the open access policy and, in accordance with Law No. 30035, makes its content available to the academic community and the general public through its online platform:

  • The content is available free of charge and immediately.
  • No subscription or registration is required to access the texts.
  • There is no charge for processing items.

To achieve these goals, the Ius Vocatio Journal is fully funded by the Superior Court of Justice of Huánuco with the support of the Judicial Branch Research Center.

Anti-plagiarism policy

The journal evaluates the articles with the Turnitin® system, in order to detect coincidences, similarities or plagiarism of works. The Editorial Team informs the authors of the Turnitin® results. In cases of suspected plagiarism or improper practices, the Committee may decide to reject the manuscript submission request for publication.

During the review process or after publication, if ethical misconduct is detected, the journal will act in accordance with the suggestions provided by the Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (COPE). 

It may be decided to retract the article or to ban the manuscript in the future. It may also be communicated to the respective authorities and other journals may be notified of the case if so decided.

No CPA

In line with the Budapest Initiative for Open Access, the journal supports the No Article Processing Charge (NAPC) policy, open access policies and DOAJ's good editorial practices for open access scientific journals, making the published content available to all its readers and accepting manuscripts strictly on the basis of their scholarly quality. The journal does not charge for evaluation, proofreading, design and layout and publication or any other work required to publish and make the article available to its readers.

I40C Standards

the journal's citations comply with I40C  standards, being separable, structured and open.

Sponsors

Superior Court of Justice of Huanuco

Judicial Branch of Peru

Conflict of interest
In the event of a conflict of interest, the author must declare it in the Letter of Originality sent to the journal at the time the manuscript is submitted. Conflicts of interest not declared at the evaluation stage will be subject to clarificatid, the article will be retracted from the journal and an explanation of the decision will be included in accordance with the COPE ethical principles to which the journal subscribeson by the author when contacted by the Editorial Team of the journal. If the explanation is not satisfactory, the manuscript will be withdrawn from the editorial process. In the case of research that has already been publishe.

Instructions on financing

The author should indicate the source of funding related to the work to be published. In the case of funding, the author should record the following: "The research was carried out with funding from .... in the framework of the research project..." or "Self-financed"; or, otherwise, "The research was carried out without financing" or ""The research was not financed".

 

CRediT - Taxonomy of Academic Collaboration Roles
The journal is committed to promoting transparency and appropriate recognition of individual contributions to legal research. In line with this initiative, we have implemented the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) to clearly identify and attribute contributors' responsibilities in each of our articles, reduce disputes among authors, and encourage scholarly participationWe understand that legal research frequently involves collaborative work in which several individuals play diverse roles. Therefore, we have adopted the Credit to provide a more complete picture of who has contributed and to what extent to each article published in our journal.

Below are the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) role categories we use [1]:

  1. Conceptualization: Ideas; formulation or evolution of overall research objectives and goals.
  2. Data Curation: Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), clean data, and maintain research data (including software code, when necessary to interpret the data itself) for initial use and subsequent reuse.
  3. Formal analysis: Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize the study data.
  4. Acquisition of funding: Acquisition of financial support for the project that has given rise to this publication.
  5. Research: Conducting a search and research process, specifically conducting experiments or data collection/testing.
  6. Methodology: Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
  7. Project administration: Management responsibility and coordination of the planning and execution of research activities.
  8. Resources: Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory specimens, animals, instrumentation, computer resources or other analytical tools.
  9. Software: Programming, software development; design of computer programs; implementation of computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
  10. Supervision: Supervisory and leadership responsibility for planning and execution of research activity, including mentoring external to the core team.
  11. Validation: Verification, as part of the activity or separately, of the overall explanation/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research products.
  12. Visualization: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of published work, specifically visualization/presentation of data.
  13. Writing - original draft: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing of the initial draft (including translation of the original draft).
  14. Writing - reviewing and editing: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of published work by members of the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision, including pre- or post-publication phases.

These categories are used in our articles to indicate the contribution of each contributor. Each author is assigned to one or more of these roles, depending on his or her actual participation in the research project. This ensures that each individual's work is properly recognized and encourages fair and transparent collaboration in the legal community.

We encourage our authors and contributors to be aware of the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (Credit) and to use it to describe their contribution in the articles they submit to our journal. This will help our readers to better understand the authorship of each paper and to recognize the diversity of roles in legal research.

We are committed to maintaining high standards of transparency and recognition in the publication of legal research and hope that this initiative will benefit the academic community and justice in general.For more information about the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (Credit) or how to use it in your contributions, please do not hesitate to contact our editorial team.

Template for article submission
Authors should submit the text of their article using the manuscript submission template.