The Brasilia Rules and the rights of the child or adolescent in the procedural sphere
Abstract
In recent years, the Brasilia Rules have enhanced the judicial and procedural parameters because they have regulated mechanisms for legal action in favor of persons in vulnerable situations. Consequently, they receive better attention in the protection of their rights. In effect, the Brasilia Rules improve the particular and special conditions of these persons. Special evaluation elements include: gender perspective, assistance to persons with disabilities, protection of the rights and interests of children and adolescents, guardianship of unprotected migrants, as well as a multicultural and bilingual perspective. These elements are the premises with which judicial systems in Latin America seek to efficiently address the demands that develop in their jurisdictions. As a general standard of reference, the purposes of the Brasilia Rules appear to improve the justice administration system. However, a more detailed analysis of the judicial context and procedural participation, and the evaluation of judicialized family conflicts involving children and adolescents, allows us to detail some conditions that require more special attention. In particular, civil procedural rules should take into account the human context and the circumstances in which children find themselves in the middle of a judicial process where their parents are the main actors.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Andreu-Guzmán, F. y Courtis, C. (2008). Comentarios sobre las 100 Reglas de Brasilia sobre Acceso a la Justicia de las Personas en Condición de Vulnerabilidad. En Ministerio Público de la Defensa - Defensoría General de la Nación, Defensa pública: garantía de acceso a la justicia (pp. 51-60). Defensoría General de la Nación.
Bermúdez, M. (2007a). El desarrollo estatal, jurisdiccional y familiar de la protección del interés superior del niño. IUS Doctrina, (8), 163-173.
Bermúdez, M. (2007b). La violencia familiar invisible provocada por la separación o divorcio. Campus. Revista de la Escuela de Postgrado de la UPAO, 2(3), 7-33.
Bermúdez, M. (2009). El síndrome de alienación parental. Revista de Derecho de Familia: Doctrina, Jurisprudencia, Legislación, (44), 255-284.
Bermúdez, M. (2011). Constitucionalización del derecho de familia. Editorial Caballero Bustamante.
Bermúdez, M. (2012). Derecho procesal de familia. Editorial San Marcos.
Bermúdez, M. (2017a). El derecho de familia en la postmodernidad. Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego.
Bermúdez, M. (2017b). Los derechos y obligaciones paterno filiales. Ediciones Nueva Jurídica.
Bermúdez, M. (2018a). El conflicto familiar como problema humano y el vínculo familiar a ser tutelado. Revista de Derecho de la UCB, 2(3), 27-44.
Bermúdez, M. (2018b). El efecto Doppelgänger en los conflictos de familia judicializados. Gaceta Civil & Procesal Civil, (60), 261-268.
Bermúdez, M. (2019a). Elementos procesales y probatorios en el derecho de familia. Ediciones Nueva Jurídica.
Bermúdez, M. (2019b). La evaluación constitucional de derechos en el derecho de familia. Gaceta Jurídica.
Carrión, J. y Zárate, P. (2007). Cultura política de la democracia en el Perú, 2006. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
Cummings, M. y Davies, P. (2011). Marital conflict and children. An emotional security perspecive. The Guilford Press.
Dakolias, M. (ed.). (1999). Court performance around the world. A comparative perspective. World Bank.
Dunn, J., O’Connor, T. G. y Cheng, H. (2005). Children’s responses to conflict between their different parents: mothers, stepfathers, nonresident fathers, and nonresident stepmothers. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(2), 223-234.
Ferrajoli, L. (2001). Derechos y garantías. La ley del más débil. Trotta.
Glasser, P. H. y Glasser, L. N. (1962). Role reversal and conflicto between aged parents and their children. Marriage and Family Living, 24(1), 46-51.
Llaneza, F. (2007). Ergonomía y psicosociología aplicada: manual para la formación del especialista. Lex Nova.
Martínez-Pujalte, A. (1997). La garantía del contenido esencial de los derechos fundamentales. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Nakash-Eisikovits, O., Dutra, L. y Westen, D. (2002). Relationship between attachment patterns and personality pathology in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(9), 1111-1123.
Rawls, J. (1997). Teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
South, S. C. (2021). Pathology in relationships. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, (17), 577-601.
Tamer, V. (2013). Legitimidad judicial en la garantía de los derechos sociales: especial referencia a la ejecución penal en Brasil. Universidad de Salamanca.
Copyright (c) 2021 Manuel Bermúdez Tapia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyrights and register under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the use of the published material (adapt - remix, transform and build - and share - copy and redistribute - the material in any medium or format).
a. The journal allows authors to retain their copyright of submitted articles without any restrictions.
b. Authors retain the right to share, distribute, copy, perform and publicly communicate the article published in Llapanchipaq Justicia (e.g., place it in an institutional repository).
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
